Thursday, March 29, 2007
Singapore Defense Firm Thrives in U.S.
So which company did Coburn join? Northrop Grumman? Lockheed Martin? Nope. Try VT Systems. The Alexandria, Va., company is the U.S. subsidiary of Singapore Technologies Engineering, a $2.9 billion (revenues) aerospace and defense concern ranked No. 1661 on the 2007 Forbes Global 2000.
“It was an opportunity to grow something,” says Coburn, 65, VT System’s chief executive. “I wanted to see how far I could take it.”
In sales term, he’s taken it fairly far. Since 2002, annual revenues at VT Systems have gone from $163 million to $788 million (for its fiscal year, ended last December). That increase has helped parent company ST Engineering turn in 17% annualized revenue growth over the past three years, a number bested only by L-3 Communications Holdings and Precision Castparts among the aerospace and defense industry components of our Forbes Global 2000 list.
The fortunes of VT Systems and its parent also underscore how the forces of globalization are as pertinent to the U.S. defense business as any other. “The U.S. is going to have to get used to this globally-integrated defense industrial base,” says James Lewis, analyst with Washington’s Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Full story at Forbes.com
Thursday, March 22, 2007
Breaking The Grip On Storage
But the event also has its share of scrappy upstarts looking to gain ground on bigger competitors. Boulder, Colo.'s LeftHand Networks, an information storage concern, is one.
"[FOSE] gives us a great forum," says LeftHand chief executive William Chambers, 46.
Full Story at Forbes.com
Wednesday, March 21, 2007
Network Stocks: A View From Washington
"A lot of the routed networks out there are kind of long in the tooth," says Robert Stevens, a vice president at Juniper Networks and the head of its federal government business. "It's time to upgrade."
In terms of placing your bets, two competitors stand out here: Juniper and Cisco Systems. Which stock looks more attractive now? The metrics give mixed signals.
In the realm of price-to-earnings ratios, the advantage goes to Cisco. Based on consensus earnings forecasts for the next two fiscal years, Cisco's P/E multiples are 20 and 17, respectively. Juniper now carries equivalent multiples of 23 and 19.
But Juniper looks cheaper by other measures. Its price-to-book ratio now stands at 1.7, versus 6.0 at Cisco. The stock also looks relatively less expensive according to the price-to-sales, price-to-cash flow (in the sense of net income plus depreciation) and enterprise multiples. The latter is defined as enterprise value (market value plus net debt) divided by earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Juniper's enterprise multiple is just 4.9, versus 14.1 for Cisco.
Given the split decision in the numbers, the investment decision may boil down to a simple choice: incumbent or insurgent?
Full story at Forbes.com
Wednesday, March 14, 2007
Political Risk Watch: Hotels
Yet could politics prove a problem? The industry's standard bearers in
"Many of them are good for our industry," says Joseph A. McInerney, chief executive of the American Hotel & Lodging Association (AHLA). "Some of them are not that great."
Friday, March 09, 2007
Beltway Bet: Ceradyne
Early in his presentation, Ceradyne Vice President Marc King distinguished his employer from the pack. "The majority of what we do today is related to defense," he said, "however, I want to be perfectly clear, we do not categorize ourselves as a defense company."
Not a defense company, eh? No, that wouldn't be perfectly clear to the casual observer of Ceradyne's business. The
Wednesday, March 07, 2007
Skunk At The Innovation Party
Network neutrality crashed the party.
The hearing was called by Rep. Nydia Velázquez, D-N.Y., who in January became chairwoman of the House Committee on Small Business and declared herself a champion for entrepreneurs. But at Wednesday's hearing, Velázquez and colleagues heard from groups representing big businesses too.
Among the eight trade associations on the witness panel: USTelecom, whose members include AT&T and Verizon Communications, and the American Electronics Association, which counts Apple and Intel among the 2,500 companies on its roster.
There was agreement on most of the items discussed.
But then they got around to network neutrality--the matter of whether big Internet service providers should be allowed to charge certain customers, mainly big bandwidth consumers like Google and Yahoo!, extra for access.
